John Yalu, 41, has pleaded not guilty to murdering Kalman Tal in February 2022 in Innisfail, Far North Queensland, but admitted the lesser charge of manslaughter.
WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: Grim details emerge in circular saw amputation murder trial
Sign up to The Nightly’s newsletters.
Get the first look at the digital newspaper, curated daily stories and breaking headlines delivered to your inbox.
By continuing you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.
The Supreme Court trial in Cairns has heard confronting allegations Tal spent years begging people to amputate his leg after suffering chronic pain he said doctors refused to treat by removal.
The court also heard Tal had researched amputation and euthanasia online for years before the fatal procedure.
Jurors were told he had become increasingly determined to have the limb removed after suffering chronic pain linked to a workplace injury.
Police cordoned off part of the Innisfail riverfront after the alleged amputation left a man fatally injured in the early hours of February 19, 2022. Credit: 7NEWS
“It was a debilitating pain, that lasted some four to five years and he couldn’t get help for it,” he told jurors.
The defence said Tal had openly told people: “My leg is killing me, I’m having trouble walking, standing and the doctors won’t do anything about it.”
The defence argued Tal had been “shopping around” for someone willing to amputate the limb.
“I suggest this was Kalman Tal, who else would it be,” Edwards told jurors.
John Yalu has pleaded not guilty to murder over the death of Innisfail man Kalman Tal. Credit: 7NEWS
Earlier in the trial, prosecutors alleged Yalu amputated Tal’s left leg above the ankle using a battery-powered circular saw after agreeing to perform the procedure for $5000.
Jurors were shown confronting CCTV footage prosecutors say captured the amputation and the moments afterwards.
The Crown argued there had been “plenty of time to stop, to pull out, to get up and walk away”.
“But the defendant didn’t, because he made a decision to stay,” Justice Henry summarised.
Prosecutors also argued the blood loss would have been immediately obvious.
“The blood would have flowed with the opening and cutting, but still the defendant chose to press on,” the judge said.
Jurors were also told attempts to stop the bleeding using sticky tape and plastic shopping bags as makeshift tourniquets were unsuccessful.
The trial previously heard Tal later collapsed while “bleeding profusely” before crawling back towards his car.
Jurors also heard Tal attempted to apply a tourniquet to himself before driving away from the park and contacting emergency services.
Emergency crews and forensic investigators examined the riverside crime scene where prosecutors allege the amputation took place. Credit: 7NEWSPolice established multiple crime scenes around the Innisfail esplanade as investigators pieced together the events leading to Tal’s death. Credit: 7NEWS
About 4.30am, he was found unconscious beside his vehicle near an Innisfail fish and chip shop after handing a mobile phone already connected to triple-0 to a passer-by.
Emergency services attempted CPR and applied a tourniquet, but Tal died from blood loss caused by the amputation.
The defence said Yalu voluntarily detailed his version of events to police.
“He told the police everything,” Edwards said.
“He didn’t have to, but he wanted to tell police his series of events.”
According to the defence case, Tal organised almost every aspect of the encounter himself and directed parts of the process once the amputation began.
Yalu believed he was helping relieve Tal’s suffering rather than intending to seriously injure or kill him, they argued.
“Not to do grievous bodily harm but to alleviate the suffering of Mr Tal,” Edwards said.
“The accused honestly believed he was helping an old man who was experiencing pain.”
The court also heard Yalu suggested going to police beforehand, but Tal refused.
A reserve juror was dismissed during proceedings after developing a heart condition.
Yalu has already admitted manslaughter, meaning jurors must now decide whether prosecutors have proven the more serious charge beyond reasonable doubt.
The jury continues deliberating on Friday.
