Australian television news is approaching a crossroads, and simply cutting costs won’t solve the industry’s biggest problem.
As audiences further fragment and commercial pressures intensify, perhaps it’s time to ask whether Australia’s decades-old model of every broadcaster running its own newsroom still makes sense.
Fresh reports over the weekend suggesting Network 10 is exploring options to outsource parts of its news operation have once again put the future of commercial television news in Australia under the spotlight.
– Advertisement –
It’s hardly a new conversation. The Australian’s Steve Jackson has been reporting on the possibility for months, and while Paramount Australia (the owner of Network 10) has not confirmed such plans, sustained reporting of this nature rarely continues without at least some confidence in the underlying information.
Whether those discussions ultimately lead anywhere is almost beside the point.
They follow a period of significant change at Network 10, including the cancellation of The Project and the launch of 10 News+, but they also reflect a broader reality facing the industry: Australia’s commercial broadcasters are under increasing financial pressure.
Nine’s Future News strategy reflects the broader pressures facing Australian television newsrooms (image – The Local Project)
For decades, Australia’s television news landscape has operated on the assumption that every network should own and operate its own newsroom.
Every broadcaster largely maintains its own studios, control rooms, camera crews, editors, producers, graphics teams, journalists and technical infrastructure, all while competing for largely the same audience in an increasingly fragmented media market to produce daily news bulletins, rolling digital coverage, breaking news and current affairs programming.
But what if that’s no longer the only way? What if the future of Australian television news isn’t another round of cost-cutting, but an entirely different production model?
– Advertisement –
The irony is that Australia’s television industry has already spent the better part of two decades outsourcing almost everything else. Once upon a time, the networks produced the vast majority of their own entertainment programming. Today, many of their biggest shows are made by independent production companies, with broadcasters commissioning content rather than building it themselves.
MasterChef Australia is produced by Endemol Shine Australia. The Voice comes from ITV Studios Australia. Australian Idol is made by Eureka Productions. Even live sport often relies on specialist outside broadcast providers and production partners. The business model shifted years ago because it made commercial sense.
Yet news has remained the final frontier.
That’s somewhat understandable. News isn’t just another television genre. It’s a network’s identity, its public service obligation and, for many viewers, the most important measure of its credibility. The idea of handing any part of that operation to an outside organisation has long been viewed as unthinkable.
If anything, Australia has already been moving towards a more consolidated television landscape — yet the industry’s approach to television news has remained remarkably resistant to structural change.
Regional television has already undergone significant consolidation, with WIN’s takeover of NBN Television resulting in Newcastle’s hour-long local bulletin being replaced by a shorter, pre-recorded news service (image – NBN)
Regional television has undergone significant structural change in recent years, particularly in recent months as advertising markets have softened. WIN’s acquisition of NBN Television brought an end to Newcastle’s long-running hour-long 6pm local news bulletin, replacing it with a shorter, pre-recorded 5.30pm program.
Seven West Media stepped in to acquire Southern Cross Austereo’s remaining regional television assets after an earlier proposed sale to Australian Digital Holdings collapsed, before those same assets ultimately returned to Southern Cross Austereo ownership when it acquired Seven earlier this year, further illustrating just how fluid Australia’s regional television landscape has become.
– Advertisement –
Network 10 has also brought the production of regional news updates in former Southern Cross markets in-house following its acquisition of those licences. At the same time, the broadcaster faces the prospect of losing free-to-air distribution in further regional markets if a long-term agreement cannot be reached to continue supplying its programming to affiliate station owners, highlighting the broader structural pressures facing commercial television.
None of these decisions happened in isolation. They were commercial responses to the same underlying challenge: rising costs, softer advertising markets and changing audience habits.
Meanwhile, the metro broadcasters continue searching for efficiencies of their own. Seven and Nine have both undertaken significant restructures in recent months, with redundancies reaching into their news divisions as audiences continue shifting towards streaming and digital platforms.
It’s also worth remembering that not every broadcaster is operating under the same financial settings. Despite holding the same commercial television broadcasting licence obligations as its competitors, Network 10 is ineligible for government journalism funding because of its foreign ownership.
Whether that policy is right or wrong is a debate for another day, but it illustrates just how uneven the commercial landscape has become.
It’s also a timely reminder of why the Federal Government’s proposed News Media Bargaining Incentive matters. If policymakers believe public interest journalism is worth protecting, then the financial settings need to recognise the growing pressures facing Australia’s commercial television newsrooms.
The pressures may be different, but the underlying challenge is increasingly the same. The ABC, SBS and Sky News each operate under different funding and ownership models, but all face the task of balancing rising production costs, evolving technology and changing audience habits while continuing to deliver trusted journalism.
Yet despite all of that change, one assumption has remained largely untouched: that every metropolitan commercial broadcaster should continue to own, staff and operate a complete news organisation in every capital city.
It was a logical model when television commanded mass audiences, advertising revenue flowed freely and nightly news bulletins were among the biggest programs on television. Today, viewers consume news across countless platforms, audiences are increasingly fragmented, and the economics underpinning that model look very different.
The United Kingdom confronted this question decades ago.
Independent Television News (ITN) has long demonstrated that editorial independence and production don’t necessarily have to sit under the same roof. By separating production from editorial decision-making, ITN allows broadcasters to retain distinct news brands while sharing the cost of gathering and producing the news itself.
Today, ITN provides news gathering and production services to multiple broadcasters, including ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5, while each network retains its own editorial voice, presenters and identity.
This isn’t an argument for one Australian broadcaster producing another’s news, nor is it an argument for further consolidation of Australia’s media landscape. Rather, it’s an acknowledgement that the industry is already changing and a question of whether there are more sustainable ways to produce television news without compromising editorial independence.
If the current model is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain, then it’s reasonable to ask whether there is a better one.
Could Australia support an independent television news organisation that provides production infrastructure, newsgathering resources and technical capabilities to multiple clients — from commercial broadcasters and regional networks to subscription television and streaming services — while leaving editorial decision-making entirely in the hands of each outlet?
Perhaps the answer is yes.
Perhaps it isn’t.
But continuing down the current path doesn’t feel like much of a strategy either.
Every few years another round of redundancies arrives. Another newsroom is restructured. Another regional service is scaled back. Another broadcaster searches for savings, while the underlying business model remains largely unchanged.
The latest reporting has simply brought those questions back into focus.
The question is no longer whether Australia’s television news industry is changing.
It already has.
The real question is whether Australia’s broadcasters are prepared to rethink the model before the economics make that decision for them.
– Advertisement –
