L’Edito du Rezo
Ce que l’on retiendra de cette équipe qui, en principe, devrait quitter la Villa d’Accueil par la porte de derrière : une gouvernance associée à l’immobilisme institutionnel, à l’effritement sécuritaire et à une rupture profonde entre l’État et la population. « Ce sont des jouisseurs suffocants », résume le Dr Josué Renaud.
Haiti enters a new political phase under deep scepticism as transition legacy fuels fears of recycled failure
Port-au-Prince — As Haiti approaches the formal end of the Transitional Presidential Council (CPT) mandate on 7 February, critics are sharpening their assessment of what they describe as a failed governance experiment marked by drift, insecurity and institutional paralysis. Political voices argue that nearly 22 months have been removed from the country’s institutional trajectory, extending a cycle of stalled state authority already associated with previous transitional arrangements. For many observers, the closing ceremony risks resembling a procedural endpoint rather than a substantive political achievement.
Attention is now turning to the forthcoming report from Transparency International, due on 11 February, which will provide an external benchmark of Haiti’s governance environment through its corruption perception index. Analysts expect the report to reinforce existing concerns about administrative opacity, weak accountability mechanisms and persistent perceptions of impunity. A poor score could further damage Haiti’s international credibility, potentially shaping donor confidence, investment flows and diplomatic positioning at a moment of heightened political fragility.
Beyond immediate political fallout, the CPT period is increasingly being framed by critics as a chapter in Haiti’s longer struggle over sovereignty, representation and institutional legitimacy. The transition has fuelled debate over whether political authority has been exercised domestically or shaped by external influence. As the country prepares to move into a new phase of governance, the central question remains whether post-transition leadership can restore public trust, reassert state authority and deliver a credible democratic pathway forward.
For a growing segment of civil society and political analysts, the end of the CPT cycle may not close the debate but instead open a more severe phase of historical evaluation. The transition is increasingly viewed through the prism of cumulative institutional erosion, where each unresolved governance failure compounds public distrust and weakens the perceived authority of future administrations. In that reading, the post-7 February period will not benefit from a presumption of legitimacy but will instead operate under an immediate demand for measurable institutional results, particularly in security restoration, judicial functionality and territorial state presence.
Ultimately, the coming months may define whether Haiti enters a phase of institutional reconstruction or deepens a pattern of extended transitional governance without structural transformation. The historical judgement of this period will likely depend less on formal political ceremonies and more on whether the next authorities demonstrate a tangible rupture from administrative stagnation, systemic insecurity and the perception that political survival can occur independently of governance performance.
J’aime ça :
chargement…
