Oxford United’s plans to build a new stadium have sparked a council row, with campaigners launching legal action to block the development.
Friends of Stratfield Brake has submitted a judicial review claim to the High Court against Cherwell District Council, seeking to overturn the planning permission granted for the 16,000-seat venue.
The Championship club’s planned relocation to a site known as the Triangle, situated near Kidlington, now faces potential delays as campaigners argue the council’s approval process was fundamentally flawed.
The legal action, brought with representation from the law firm Leigh Day, aims to convince a judge that the planning decision should be quashed in its entirety.
The proposed development extends beyond the stadium itself.
Plans for a hotel, restaurant and conference centre have been proposed at the new location.
Oxford United would move from its existing ground to the Triangle site under the approved plans.
The comprehensive scheme represents a significant investment in club facilities, combining matchday operations with commercial ventures to generate revenue throughout the week.
Oxford United’s plans to build a new stadium have sparked a council row
|
OXFORD UNITED
However, the judicial review threatens to derail these ambitions, with campaigners insisting that fundamental questions about the development’s impact remain unanswered by local planning authorities.
Friends of Stratfield Brake contends that the council did not adequately consider guidance from Natural England on the environmental consequences for the adjacent woodland.
The statutory body had advised taking a precautionary approach, given uncertainty over whether the woodland qualifies as ancient.
Transport arrangements on matchdays form the second pillar of the legal challenge, with campaigners disputing the council’s assumptions about road closures.
The Championship club planned its relocation to a site known as the Triangle
|
The group maintains there is insufficient evidence to support claims that traffic management measures can be implemented and dismantled swiftly enough to minimise disruption.
These twin concerns over ecological protection and transport logistics underpin the judicial review, with campaigners arguing neither issue received proper scrutiny during the planning process.
A spokesman for the group said: “We have engaged with the council throughout this process and made our concerns clear at every stage, including through formal legal correspondence.
“Unfortunately, those concerns have not been addressed, leaving us with no option but to bring this judicial review. We believe the decision is flawed and that the impacts of this development on the adjacent woodland and transport have not been properly considered.”
Campaigners seek to overturn the planning permission granted for the 16,000-seat venue
|
OXFORD UNITED
Ricardo Gama, a partner at Leigh Day, said: “Our clients felt they had no choice but to file court proceedings because the council has failed to address their concerns over the impact which the stadium development would have on an ecologically important woodland and on local traffic.”
Oxford United are currently battling to avoid relegation from the Championship.
They sit in 23rd but are only one point away from safety as the season draws to an end.
A spokesman for Cherwell District Council said: “The council is confident in its decision and in the event of any judicial review will robustly defend its position.”
