Synopsis: GIFT City has emerged as India’s first International Financial Services Centre, attracting banks, fund managers, and global capital. While its rapid growth and foreign currency focus complement Mumbai’s financial ecosystem, the city’s scale, liquidity, and talent depth remain far smaller, making it a specialized hub rather than a substitute for Mumbai.
With the rapid rise of the Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City) and its International Financial Services Centre (IFSC), many are asking how this new financial hub fits into India’s economy. Its growth raises questions about financial power, capital flows, regulation, and the networks of people that drive markets. To understand its true potential, we need to look not just at ambition, but at real scale, depth, and the strength of the ecosystem behind it. The big question is: could GIFT City ever become a substitute for Mumbai as India’s financial capital?
Mumbai’s Dominance: A Century of Financial Gravity
Mumbai’s status as India’s financial capital is far from symbolic. It is woven into the country’s economic DNA, anchored by established institutions and massive market scale that have evolved over more than 150 years. According to widely cited economic summaries of the city’s economy, Mumbai contributes roughly 6.16 percent of India’s total GDP, accounts for 70 percent of capital transactions, and is home to the country’s most significant corporate, banking, and capital markets ecosystem.
At the heart of this ecosystem are the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE). The BSE, founded in 1875, is Asia’s oldest stock exchange, with over 5,300 listed companies, making it among the world’s largest exchange platforms by listing count.
The NSE, headquartered in Mumbai, supports multi-trillion-dollar trading volumes, including equity, debt, and derivative contracts, and was a key driver in India’s emergence as the world’s fourth-largest stock market by combined market capitalization (Including BSE).
Alongside exchanges, Mumbai houses the headquarters of the Reserve Bank of India, major public and private banks, large asset managers, insurance giants, and thousands of financial services firms. That density of corporate decision-making, from capital allocation to risk management is foundational to financial capital status.
This established ecosystem has been resistant to rapid displacement because scale tends to reinforce itself: deep markets attract liquidity, liquidity draws institutions, and institutions create career pathways that concentrate talent in one place.
GIFT City’s Rise: Fast Growth on a New Frontier
GIFT City is a deliberate policy construct, built from scratch as India’s first International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) to provide a platform for cross-border financial transactions in foreign currencies. It combines financial services with a smart city infrastructure and preferential tax, regulatory, and operational regimes designed to attract global capital and institutions.
GIFT IFSC’s growth over the past decade has been remarkable in absolute terms. As of late 2025, the hub hosts over 1,034 registered entities spanning banks, capital markets, fund managers, insurers, and leasing firms, with 38 banks collectively holding approximately USD 100.14 billion in assets under management. The scale of financial transactions is also impressive: the IFSC recorded monthly trading turnovers on its exchanges reaching over USD 100 billion, reflecting growing market participation in foreign currency trading and derivatives.
The fund management ecosystem within GIFT City is another success story: As of June 2025, 177 fund management entities (FMEs) have launched over 270 schemes, with cumulative commitments approaching USD 22.1 billion, and industry projections suggest total assets could surpass USD 100 billion by 2030.
Because operations within GIFT IFSC are denominated in foreign currencies, the platform is particularly attractive to non-resident investors and multinational corporations seeking to raise and deploy capital efficiently across borders without incurring rupee conversion friction.
Scale vs. Depth: Why Mumbai Still Reigns in Core Financial Markets
While GIFT City’s numbers may seem impressive on paper, they must be contextualised relative to Mumbai’s existing scale. Mumbai’s stock exchanges and banking networks handle trillions in daily trading and institutional flows, a magnitude that dwarfs GIFT City’s current figures. The NSE and BSE together contribute a majority of India’s financial market turnover and capital raising activity, shaping domestic investment outcomes and capital formation in ways GIFT City cannot yet match.
For example, the combined market cap of India’s equity markets, largely through Mumbai’s exchanges, ran into multiple trillions of dollars in recent assessments, making India one of the top equity markets globally. This breadth drives liquidity, the lifeblood of financial centres and sustains ecosystem players, from brokers and analysts to fund managers and risk professionals.
Mutual fund and asset management industries also highlight Mumbai’s dominance. Independent industry reports indicate that Mumbai accounts for more than a quarter of all mutual fund assets under management (AUM) in India, reflecting both institutional concentration and investor trust tied to the city’s markets.
By contrast, GIFT City’s fund commitments, though growing rapidly, are a fraction of these figures and largely driven by offshore vehicles and dollar-denominated schemes, security and wealth management approaches that complement domestic capital markets, rather than replace them.
Ecosystem, Talent, and Urban Infrastructure: More Than Numbers
Finance is not just about transactions, it’s about people, networks, culture, and urban vibrancy. Mumbai’s long-standing status as a global city has attracted top financial talent not merely because of its institutions, but because the city hosts a dense talent ecosystem comprising legal firms, consultancies, fintech innovators, educational institutions, and international firms.
This deep human capital footprint enables seamless movement of ideas and expertise that underpins capital flows. The city’s metropolitan scale also supports large residential populations, with millions of professionals living within its orbit and diversified sectors beyond finance that reinforce economic resilience.
GIFT City, by contrast, remains a young urban node. With its planned built-up area still only partially operational and its residential population small in comparison, it currently lacks the urban scale and cultural magnetism that make financial capitals sustainable beyond office hours.
Near-Term Reality
Based on current market scale, institutional depth, and ecosystem dynamics, it is highly unlikely that GIFT City will serve as a meaningful substitute for Mumbai in this decade. Mumbai’s position is built on historical momentum, liquidity concentration, and structural depth, characteristics that cannot be replicated through policy incentives alone. Financial capitals evolve over generations, sustained by networks of capital, trust, talent, and global connectivity.
GIFT City’s growth trajectory, though impressive, remains limited in absolute scale. Its IFSC strengths including foreign currency markets, offshore vehicles, and international fund management, primarily address specialized global financial activities rather than the broad domestic markets that define Mumbai. In the near term, GIFT City functions as a complementary hub, offering India an international platform while leaving the core domestic financial ecosystem anchored in Mumbai.
Longer-Term Possibility
Looking beyond the decade, the narrative could change. If GIFT City continues its expansion, attracts larger pools of dollar-denominated capital, and builds a more vibrant urban ecosystem, it might evolve into a second financial capital, one that specializes in international finance, treasury management, offshore lending, and global institutional flows.
Projections that fund commitments could surpass USD 100 billion by 2030 reflect a structural shift in asset management scale. Such growth could allow GIFT City to function as a partial substitute for Mumbai in specific financial functions, particularly in international finance, treasury management, and offshore fund flows.
Yet even in this scenario, Mumbai would remain India’s primary financial capital, and GIFT City’s role would be complementary rather than fully substitutive, requiring a dramatic shift of domestic markets, corporate decision centers, and deep liquidity pools to meaningfully expand its substitution over decades.
Conclusion: Extension Today, Competition Tomorrow
GIFT City represents a strategic extension of India’s financial architecture, designed to capture global capital flows, provide an internationalised platform, and retain offshore activities on Indian soil. In that mission, it has already delivered significant wins and continues to scale rapidly.
However, the data tell a clear story. Mumbai’s financial capital status is deeply embedded across multiple dimensions that no newly built centre, however well-funded and strategically positioned, can displace in the near future. Mumbai’s markets are larger by orders of magnitude, its institutional ecosystem is far broader, and its human capital networks are more deeply rooted. GIFT City complements this presence but does not yet rival it.
In the long arc of financial history, cities that command markets evolve slowly, shaped by layers of infrastructure, trust, and networks. GIFT City may one day be a co-equal global financial node, but replacing Mumbai as India’s financial capital would require more than policy and infrastructure; it would require markets to choose it as their primary home, a process that typically spans decades, not years.
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on tradebrains.in are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Investing in equities poses a risk of financial losses. Investors must therefore exercise due caution while investing or trading in stocks. Trade Brains Technologies Private Limited or the author are not liable for any losses caused as a result of the decision based on this article. Please consult your investment advisor before investing.
