In the northern Finnish town of Muhos, the forest has already been cut down on land acquired by Google.Alessandro Rampazzo/Getty
Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.
This story was originally published by The Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.
Behind a wire fence lies a vast gaping wound of earth. Before Google’s arrival a few months ago, an estimated quarter-million trees occupied the 815 acres of forest near the town of Muhos in rural northern Finland. Now they are all gone.
After the tech company illegally stripped the entire area to build a data center— taking even the topsoil with it—all that remains is a vast expanse of mud indented with the trail marks of machinery; puddles; and mounds of earth, roots, and branches. Residents say that brown water flowing off the site is going into a stream that feeds the Oulujoki River. “It doesn’t end. It goes on and on,” says Mari Annala, an ecologist from the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation (SLL), looking at drone footage of the former forest from the perimeter
“I couldn’t believe it. I have never heard that any company has done anything like this in Finland.”
With 145 new data centers at various stages of planning, Finland has found itself at the forefront of the tech companies’ latest push. As well as its relative geopolitical and geological stability and abundance of land, the cool climate makes it especially attractive for saving on energy costs.
Earlier this month, Google was ordered by the Finnish Licensing and Supervision Authority (LVV) to temporarily stop work on Muhos and another site, about 62 miles southeast, in the village of Otanmäki after it failed to complete the necessary environmental impact assessments before clear-cutting the land. The news has prompted widespread outcry and a national reckoning over what role, if any, the country should play in the global rush to build data centers to keep up with rapid AI development.
Last week, Google’s Finland country manager, Antti Järvinen, apologized for the forest clearings, but claimed the company had acted “on the best understanding we had of the legislation at the time.”
Muhos and Otanmäki are part of a roughly $17 billion AI infrastructure project by Google that has attracted criticism from Donald Trump—who would rather the centers were built in the US and has publicly called for the company to reconsider. It is the biggest ever project of its kind in the Nordic country.
The Finnish government, which has presided over deep spending cuts, has encouraged the investment. Last month, when the Google plans were announced, the country’s prime minister, Petteri Orpo, said attracting investment was a “top priority” and “the value of the data economy extends far beyond direct investment.” He said the Google deal would “deliver lasting benefits for both parties.”
“They bought the vast land area and they just started to cut it, just like that. It’s pure arrogance and it’s amazing.”
But the revelations over Google’s misconduct have prompted public concern over what these deals mean for nearby communities, energy prices for Finnish households, and Finland’s natural environment, a national source of pride. The data center push is likely to become a key election issue when Finns go to the polls in April.
In addition to the 250,000 trees felled at Muhos, Annala estimates that an additional 150,000 trees were felled at Otanmäki. Because the trees have been felled illegally, she says wood from the two sites cannot be sold to wood-processing plants.
The move has also prompted questions over why Finland’s renewable energy sources are being used to power international corporations.
More than 93,000 people have signed a petition demanding more data center regulation and a fee to compensate local communities for environmental damage. Since the scandal broke, Orpo has described what happened in Muhos as a “cold shower.”
Hanna Halmeenpää, chair of SLL’s board, said she had been incredulous when she discovered Google’s lawbreaking. “At first I couldn’t believe it,” she said. “I have never heard that any company has done anything like this in Finland.” She said the system depended a lot on trust, which she believes Google took advantage of. “They bought the vast land area and they just started to cut it, just like that,” she said. “It’s pure arrogance and it’s amazing.”
The speed of developments had shocked the country, she said. “Many people are just watching the news and asking each other: ‘What’s happening now? What can we do about it? And do we have to take all these data center projects in Finland?’”
Hanna Halmenpaa, chair of the board of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation, is pictured near the site in Muhos, Finland, where a Google data center is set to be built.Alessando Rampazzo/Getty
Jussi Kangasharju, head of computer science at the University of Helsinki, said that while data centers brought a limited number of jobs, potentially boosting the local economy, the benefits on a national level were minimal. “Really, for Finland, there are no benefits,” he said. “They are international companies serving international customers. Very little corporate taxes go to Finland. Data centers ultimately have very little benefit for others except the data center operator.”
With legislation still playing catch-up, there is a rush to get projects under way as fast as possible.
Some are calling for a centralized body to coordinate data center projects, rather than leaving so much of the decision-making down to municipalities that are likely to prioritize the immediate needs of the local area.
The peaceful forest used to extend for miles from the village. Now the sound of building work next to the clearcut Google site reverberates.
In Muhos and Otanmäki, there are people who support the projects, along with the jobs and land taxes they will bring into the local area. But many believe they have been sold short by municipalities.
Antti Jakonen, who lives in Muhos, said that, although the trees felled represented a small fraction of Finland’s overall forests, he objected to the manner in which it had been carried out. “It has been done in the wrong way. American style. No sense. No sense at all,” he said.
The former entrepreneur and fisher wants Google to compensate by helping to restore the local salmon population destroyed decades ago by hydropower.
In Otanmäki, the disruption to nature and to residents’ daily lives is being vividly felt. When the trees were felled, the wolves who had lived there came to the village, said Anni Ranta, 53, whose family has lived there for generations.
A former mining village, the area is known for its rare earth elements. Ranta’s family live at the centre of the village next to a triangular church spire and a former bar that has been empty for years. The peaceful forest used to extend for miles from the village. Now the sound of building work next to the clearcut Google site reverberates.
“We had wolves coming into the village because all the wild animals moved out of the forest,” said Ranta. “They fled. What worries me about the data centers is also the noise because this is hardrock soil. Even when we are standing here talking,” she added, stamping her feet, “it’s like a drum.”
Such is her strength of feeling against the arrival of Google that she is thinking of moving out. She also fears the data center could make the village a target for Russia, with whom Finland shares a long border. “I don’t want them here,” she said of Google. “I don’t want them in Finland at all. I don’t like the whole idea of AI and the world changing and the way it’s changing. It’s going too fast, too soon.”
Google responded that it has “always worked to meet or exceed zoning, environmental, health, and safety requirements.”
Her father, Pentti Korhonen, a retired wilderness guide, said that since the forest was destroyed, the water in the stream has turned brown. “There is no need at all for data centers in Finland. No need for data centers at all,” he said.
Vesa Hyyryläinen, chair of the local SLL district, said three-toed woodpeckers nesting in the forest had been pushed out. “All of us nature conservationists are very worried about our Finnish political situation and politics,” said the biologist and osprey expert. “I wonder why we have to sacrifice so much of our nature. They give everything away too easily.”
He said, however, that he understood why authorities were trying to bring in new sources of investment and jobs, given the region’s ageing population. “Young people go to Helsinki and Berlin and Paris,” he said. “There are so few people. We have to sacrifice.”
Veli-Matti Uski, director general of the ministry of environment, said the government was “monitoring the general development of the [data center] sector, [and the] application of its legislation, and is prepared to propose legislative amendments as necessary.”
Google said it was working to protect water quality at the Muhos site, and that it planned to plant trees across 74 acres there. Conservationists say that figure is too low to have any real impact in comparison to the damage done by the tree felling.
A spokesperson said: “We have operated in Finland for 15 years and have always worked to meet or exceed zoning, environmental, health, and safety requirements.”
“After receiving the LVV letters on October 6, we stopped preparatory works at Muhos and Kajaani [where the Otanmäki site is located] and have submitted a formal response to LVV confirming this,” the spokesperson continued. “We will fully comply with LVV’s requests in this matter. We look forward to maintaining an active, open dialogue with all authorities to strengthen our partnership with Finland and local organizations.”
